Art for art's sake is a philosophy of the well-fed

Art for art's sake is a philosophy of the well-fed

Frank Lloyd Wright, the renowned American architect, was known for his innovative designs and groundbreaking approach to architecture. He was a firm believer in the idea that art should be created for its own sake, rather than for any external purpose or function. This philosophy is encapsulated in his famous quote, “Art for art's sake is a philosophy of the well-fed.”

Wright's words suggest that the pursuit of art for its own sake is a luxury that only those who are well-fed and financially secure can afford. In other words, the idea of creating art purely for the sake of artistic expression and beauty is a privilege that is not available to everyone. For many people, art serves a practical purpose – it is a means of earning a living, expressing political or social messages, or simply providing entertainment. However, Wright believed that true art should transcend these practical concerns and exist purely for its own sake.

Wright's philosophy of art for art's sake reflects his belief in the importance of creativity and self-expression. He saw art as a way of connecting with the deeper truths of the universe and expressing the innermost thoughts and emotions of the artist. For Wright, art was a form of spiritual practice, a way of transcending the mundane concerns of everyday life and tapping into a higher realm of existence.

However, Wright's words also hint at a certain elitism and privilege that is inherent in the idea of art for art's sake. The notion that only the well-fed can afford to create art purely for its own sake implies that art is a luxury that is out of reach for many people who struggle to meet their basic needs. This raises important questions about the accessibility of art and the role of artists in society. Should art be reserved for the privileged few, or should it be a universal human right that is available to all?