Conspicuous by his absence

Conspicuous by his absence

In the context of Tacitus, the phrase "conspicuous by his absence" holds a significant meaning. Tacitus, a Roman historian and senator, is known for his works that provide valuable insights into the political and social landscape of ancient Rome. His writings, particularly his Annals and Histories, are considered crucial sources for understanding the history of the Roman Empire.

When we say someone is "conspicuous by his absence" in the context of Tacitus, we are referring to the absence of a key figure or event in his writings. This absence can be intentional or unintentional, but it often carries a deeper meaning that sheds light on Tacitus's perspective and biases.

One example of someone being conspicuous by his absence in Tacitus's works is the emperor Tiberius. Tiberius ruled Rome from 14 AD to 37 AD, a period that was marked by political intrigue, corruption, and violence. Despite Tiberius's significant role in shaping the history of the Roman Empire, Tacitus's portrayal of him is notably sparse and ambiguous. Tiberius is often portrayed as a tyrant and a despot in other historical accounts, but Tacitus's treatment of him is more nuanced and subtle.

The absence of a detailed and damning portrayal of Tiberius in Tacitus's works can be seen as a deliberate choice on the part of the historian. Tacitus may have chosen to downplay Tiberius's atrocities in order to avoid offending the ruling elite or to present a more balanced and nuanced view of the emperor. Alternatively, Tacitus may have simply lacked sufficient information or sources to provide a comprehensive account of Tiberius's reign.

Regardless of the reasons behind Tiberius's absence in Tacitus's works, his omission is conspicuous and raises questions about the historian's motives and biases. It reminds us that historical accounts are not always objective and complete, and that the absence of certain figures or events can be just as revealing as their presence.