Covert action should not be confused with missionary work

Covert action should not be confused with missionary work

Henry Kissinger, the former United States Secretary of State and National Security Advisor, is often associated with covert actions and realpolitik. Throughout his career, Kissinger was known for his pragmatic approach to foreign policy, often engaging in covert actions to further American interests. However, it is important to note that covert action should not be confused with missionary work, as the two serve very different purposes and have different ethical implications.

Covert action refers to secret operations carried out by a government to achieve specific political or military objectives. These actions are often conducted in secret, without the knowledge or consent of the public or other countries. Covert actions can range from espionage and sabotage to political manipulation and assassination. Kissinger was known for his involvement in several covert operations, including the secret bombing of Cambodia during the Vietnam War and the overthrow of the Chilean government in 1973.

On the other hand, missionary work refers to the act of spreading religious beliefs or providing humanitarian aid to those in need. Missionary work is often motivated by a desire to help others and promote peace and understanding. While covert actions may sometimes be justified in the pursuit of national security interests, they should not be confused with the selfless and altruistic motives of missionary work.

In the context of Henry Kissinger, it is important to recognize that his actions were often driven by a realpolitik approach to foreign policy, which prioritized national interests over moral considerations. While Kissinger may have believed that his actions were necessary to protect American interests, they often came at a high cost in terms of human rights and international relations.