Elected officials shouldn't get to choose who gets to choose elected officials

Elected officials shouldn't get to choose who gets to choose elected officials

Lewis Black, the renowned comedian and social commentator, has never been one to shy away from controversial topics. One of the issues he has frequently touched upon is the concept of elected officials having the power to choose who gets to choose elected officials. In his signature fiery and passionate style, Black has argued that this practice is fundamentally undemocratic and undermines the very foundation of a fair and representative government.

Black's stance on this issue is rooted in his belief that the power to choose elected officials should ultimately rest with the people, not with those already in office. He has often pointed out the inherent conflict of interest that arises when elected officials are given the authority to determine the rules and regulations governing elections. This, he argues, opens the door to manipulation and corruption, as those in power can use their influence to stack the deck in their favor and maintain their grip on power.

Furthermore, Black has highlighted the dangers of allowing a small group of individuals to control the electoral process. By giving elected officials the power to choose who gets to choose elected officials, he argues, we are effectively disenfranchising the broader population and limiting their ability to hold their representatives accountable. This, in turn, erodes the very essence of democracy and undermines the principle of government by the people, for the people.

Black's criticisms of this practice are not without merit. Throughout history, there have been numerous instances where elected officials have abused their power to manipulate elections and consolidate their hold on power. From gerrymandering to voter suppression tactics, the ways in which those in office can influence the electoral process are varied and insidious.