I believe entertainment can aspire to be art, and can become art, but if you set out to make art you're an idiot

I believe entertainment can aspire to be art, and can become art, but if you set out to make art you're an idiot

The statement "I believe entertainment can aspire to be art, and can become art, but if you set out to make art you're an idiot" raises an interesting debate about the relationship between entertainment and art. The term "idiot" in this context can be interpreted as someone who is misguided or naive in their approach to creating art.

Entertainment and art are often seen as two separate entities, with entertainment being more focused on providing enjoyment and escapism, while art is seen as a more serious and intellectual pursuit. However, the line between the two can often be blurred, with many forms of entertainment being considered art by critics and scholars.

The idea that entertainment can aspire to be art suggests that there is potential for entertainment to transcend its traditional boundaries and achieve a higher level of artistic merit. This can be seen in works such as films, television shows, and music that are not only entertaining but also thought-provoking and emotionally resonant.

However, the statement also warns against setting out to deliberately create art, suggesting that this approach is misguided and ultimately futile. This can be interpreted as a criticism of artists who prioritize the pursuit of artistic validation over creating work that is authentic and meaningful.