I like Liz Phair, but there were these stupid women reviewers who said she's surpassing the Stones. Dream on

I like Liz Phair, but there were these stupid women reviewers who said she's surpassing the Stones. Dream on

Camille Paglia, the renowned cultural critic and feminist scholar, has never been one to shy away from controversial opinions. Known for her sharp wit and unapologetic takes on popular culture, Paglia has often found herself at odds with mainstream feminist thought. So it comes as no surprise that when the topic of Liz Phair and the Rolling Stones comes up, Paglia has something to say.

Paglia has long been a fan of Liz Phair, the indie rock singer-songwriter known for her raw and confessional lyrics. Phair's debut album, "Exile in Guyville," is considered a seminal work in the indie rock genre, and Paglia has praised her for her bold and unapologetic approach to songwriting. However, when some women reviewers began to compare Phair to the Rolling Stones, Paglia was quick to dismiss the notion.

In Paglia's eyes, the Rolling Stones are a legendary rock band that have stood the test of time, influencing countless musicians and shaping the landscape of rock music for decades. To suggest that Liz Phair, or any other contemporary artist, could surpass the Stones is, in Paglia's opinion, absurd. Paglia has often criticized what she sees as a lack of respect for the classics in modern music criticism, and this comparison between Phair and the Stones is no exception.

Paglia's views on this topic are reflective of her larger philosophy on art and culture. She believes in the importance of recognizing and honoring the achievements of the past, while also embracing the new and innovative voices of the present. Paglia sees the Rolling Stones as a foundational pillar of rock music, and to suggest that Liz Phair could surpass them is to ignore the rich history and influence of the band.