If war is the continuation of politics by other means, terrorism is the continuation of war by other means

If war is the continuation of politics by other means, terrorism is the continuation of war by other means

Pat Buchanan, a conservative political commentator and former presidential candidate, has often been vocal about his views on war and terrorism. One of his most famous quotes is, “If war is the continuation of politics by other means, terrorism is the continuation of war by other means.” This statement encapsulates Buchanan’s belief that terrorism is a form of warfare that is used by those who do not have the resources or capabilities to engage in traditional military conflict.

Buchanan’s perspective on terrorism as a continuation of war by other means is rooted in his understanding of the historical and political context in which acts of terrorism occur. He sees terrorism as a tactic employed by groups or individuals who are marginalized, oppressed, or disenfranchised and who feel that they have no other means of achieving their political goals. In this sense, terrorism can be seen as a form of asymmetric warfare, where the weaker party uses unconventional tactics to challenge a more powerful adversary.

Buchanan’s views on terrorism also reflect his skepticism of U.S. foreign policy and military interventions. He has been critical of the United States’ involvement in conflicts around the world, arguing that military action often leads to unintended consequences and exacerbates the cycle of violence. Buchanan believes that the U.S. should prioritize diplomacy and non-interventionism in its foreign policy, rather than resorting to military force.