It may be that all games are silly. But then, so are humans

It may be that all games are silly. But then, so are humans

Robert Lynd, a renowned Irish essayist and journalist, once famously remarked, "It may be that all games are silly. But then, so are humans." This statement encapsulates Lynd's keen observation of human nature and his wry sense of humor. In this context, Lynd is suggesting that the frivolity and absurdity of games mirror the inherent silliness of human behavior.

Lynd's assertion that all games are silly can be interpreted in various ways. On one level, he may be referring to the triviality of games in comparison to the serious issues and challenges that humans face in their daily lives. Games are often seen as a form of escapism, a way for people to temporarily forget their troubles and immerse themselves in a world of make-believe. In this sense, games can be seen as a frivolous and inconsequential pastime.

Furthermore, Lynd may be suggesting that the rules and conventions of games are arbitrary and nonsensical, much like the social norms and conventions that govern human behavior. Just as players must adhere to the rules of a game in order to participate, humans are expected to conform to societal expectations and norms in order to be accepted by others. However, these rules and conventions can often seem arbitrary and irrational, leading to a sense of absurdity and silliness.

Lynd's observation that humans are also silly can be seen as a reflection of his belief in the inherent flaws and contradictions of human nature. Despite our intelligence and rationality, humans are prone to irrational behavior, emotional outbursts, and illogical decision-making. We are capable of great feats of creativity and innovation, but we are also capable of great folly and foolishness.