The R rating refers to Logue's use of vulgarity. It is utterly inexplicable. This is an excellent film for teenagers

The R rating refers to Logue's use of vulgarity. It is utterly inexplicable. This is an excellent film for teenagers

Roger Ebert was a renowned film critic known for his insightful reviews and thoughtful analysis of movies. When it comes to the statement that "The R rating refers to Logue's use of vulgarity. It is utterly inexplicable. This is an excellent film for teenagers," Ebert would likely have a lot to say.

Ebert was known for his ability to look beyond surface-level details and delve into the deeper themes and messages of a film. In this case, he would likely question why a film would be given an R rating solely based on the use of vulgarity. Ebert understood that language is just one aspect of a film and should not be the sole determinant of its rating.

Ebert would likely argue that teenagers are capable of handling mature themes and language in films, and that restricting them from seeing a movie based on language alone is unnecessary. He believed that teenagers should be treated as intelligent viewers who can understand and appreciate complex narratives and characters.

Ebert would also likely praise the film for its other qualities, such as its storytelling, acting, and direction. He would highlight the film's strengths and explain why it is a valuable piece of cinema that teenagers can benefit from watching.

Overall, Ebert would likely disagree with the decision to give the film an R rating based on vulgarity alone. He would argue that teenagers are capable of handling mature content and that restricting them from seeing a film based on language is unjustified. Ebert would likely praise the film for its other qualities and recommend it to teenagers as a valuable and enriching viewing experience.