The work of science is to substitute facts for appearances, and demonstrations for impressions

The work of science is to substitute facts for appearances, and demonstrations for impressions

John Ruskin, a prominent English art critic and social thinker of the 19th century, believed that the work of science is to substitute facts for appearances, and demonstrations for impressions. This statement reflects Ruskin's belief in the importance of objective truth and empirical evidence in understanding the world around us.

Ruskin was a firm believer in the power of observation and analysis in the pursuit of knowledge. He argued that appearances can be deceiving and that it is only through careful examination and study of the facts that we can truly understand the nature of things. In his writings on art and architecture, Ruskin often emphasized the importance of looking beyond the surface to uncover the underlying truths and principles that govern the world.

For Ruskin, science was not just a means of acquiring knowledge, but also a way of challenging and correcting our preconceived notions and biases. By replacing appearances with facts and impressions with demonstrations, science helps us to see the world as it truly is, rather than as we imagine it to be. This process of discovery and verification is essential for progress and enlightenment.

Ruskin's emphasis on the importance of facts and demonstrations also reflects his belief in the power of reason and logic in shaping our understanding of the world. He believed that by subjecting our beliefs and assumptions to rigorous testing and scrutiny, we can arrive at a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of reality. This commitment to rational inquiry and empirical evidence is a central theme in Ruskin's work, and it continues to resonate with contemporary scientists and thinkers.