With no fact as a referent, what is normative is purely a matter of preference

With no fact as a referent, what is normative is purely a matter of preference

Ravi Zacharias was a renowned Christian apologist who dedicated his life to defending the faith and engaging in intellectual discussions about the existence of God and the truth of Christianity. He believed that there are objective truths that exist outside of personal preference and that these truths can be known and understood through reason and evidence.

In the context of the statement “With no fact as a referent, what is normative is purely a matter of preference,” Ravi Zacharias would likely argue that without a foundation of objective truth, morality and ethics become subjective and arbitrary. He believed that there are moral absolutes that are grounded in the nature of God and that these truths provide a framework for understanding what is right and wrong.

For Ravi Zacharias, the idea that what is normative is purely a matter of preference would be a dangerous and misguided belief. He would argue that without a standard of truth to guide our decisions and actions, society would descend into chaos and moral relativism. He believed that objective moral values exist and that they are rooted in the character of God.