Wouldn't you rather your kid be a drug dealer than a drug addict?

Wouldn't you rather your kid be a drug dealer than a drug addict?

John Waters, the iconic filmmaker known for his provocative and boundary-pushing work, has never been one to shy away from controversial topics. In fact, he has made a career out of challenging societal norms and pushing the boundaries of what is considered acceptable in mainstream culture. So it should come as no surprise that Waters has a unique perspective on the age-old question: "Wouldn't you rather your kid be a drug dealer than a drug addict?"

In typical John Waters fashion, his answer to this question is likely to be unexpected and thought-provoking. Waters has always been a champion of the underdog and the outsider, so it's possible that he would argue that being a drug dealer, while certainly not a desirable profession, may actually be preferable to being a drug addict. After all, drug dealers are often portrayed as savvy entrepreneurs who are able to navigate the dangerous world of illegal drugs and make a profit, while drug addicts are seen as helpless victims who are consumed by their addiction.

In Waters' eyes, perhaps being a drug dealer could be seen as a form of rebellion against the status quo, a way for a young person to assert their independence and challenge the oppressive forces of society. While drug dealing is certainly illegal and dangerous, it could be argued that it requires a certain level of cunning and street smarts that drug addiction does not.

Of course, this is not to say that Waters would condone or encourage drug dealing in any way. He is a staunch advocate for individual freedom and self-expression, but he is also a firm believer in personal responsibility and the consequences of one's actions. Waters may argue that neither being a drug dealer nor a drug addict is a desirable outcome for a young person, and that both paths ultimately lead to destruction and despair.